OFF THE RECORD

An Ancient Manuscript Of The Bible Has Been Discovered, Proving That It Is A Work Of Fiction?

Let me give you a FREE GIFT!

And many more in the upcoming weeks

Ronald Reagan once said: “Within the covers of the Bible are the answers for all the problems men face.”

Now it seems that within the covers of the Bible, answers about the Bible itself are to be uncovered. A fragment of the earliest known draft of the King James Bible has been discovered in Cambridge. The King James Bible is the most widely read work in English and is considered as the “preserved and living Word of God”.

The draft was found in the archives of the University of Cambridge’s Sidney Sussex College. This draft throws a light on how the King James Bible took shape in the hands of the translators.

Dr. Jeffrey Miller is the person behind this discovery. An assistant professor of English and a John Milton scholar, Dr Miller works extensively with archives. It is his interest that brought this crucial discovery of a fragment of the King James Bible composed in the hands of Samuel Ward. The draft is supposed to have been composed between 1604 and 1608.

Explaining the significance of this discovery, Dr Miller said: “In addition to being earliest draft of the King James Bible now known to survive, the draft is the only one ever found in a hand that can be definitively identified as belonging to one of the King James’ translators themselves.” He added: “It is also the only draft ever discovered of a highly controversial part of the translation, the ‘Apocrypha’, and the only draft yet to be discovered in Cambridge, one of the three initial centres of the King James Bible’s composition.”

Let me give you a FREE GIFT!

And many more in the upcoming weeks

Till now, this draft as a result of mislabelling had gone undetected by the scholars working on the Bible. “There was a kind of thunderstruck, leap-out-of-the-bathtub moment,” Dr Miller said in an interview.

Read more...

An Ancient Manuscript Of The Bible Has Been Discovered, Proving That It Is A Work Of Fiction?

However, new controversies seem to arise from this discovery. After examination and investigation of the manuscript, it was reported that the King James Bible had discarded big chunks of the original text of the Bible. Several notable people and events were completely erased from this new version. According to Dr Miller, this might have happened either because of some politics of the age or simply because of the laziness of the translators.

This discovery helps us to see the degree to which human intervention at a particular period of time has affected the Bible. Though the King James Bible is considered, as mentioned above, the “Word of God”, the unearthing of this manuscript may indicate towards the fact that this version of the Bible was actually a product of ideas and notions of the translators.

The King James Bible was a work of 47 translators working in London, Oxford and Cambridge. King James I had ordered them to produce an “authorized version of the Bible”. This version of the Bible was supposed to support the Church of England and the divine right of kings which was earlier downplayed by a Puritanical version of the holy text.

3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. Gabriel Mendoza

    September 9, 2017 at 3:16 PM

    Wow! What a discovery. Digging into this.

  2. Dave D

    September 9, 2017 at 10:39 PM

    What this proves is how is not that the Bible is fiction but that there were those who rather than translating properly sought to put forward their views. It is clear that the Apocryphal books are not part of the original Bible cannon but were attempts to impose popular (at that time) beliefs that were false and contradictory. Thankfully there are older manuscripts in the original languages of Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek that shoe those spurious writings to be false and not the Bible itself.

  3. Bowie

    September 10, 2017 at 2:15 AM

    It doesn’t actually prove that it is a work of fiction only that there is claimed to be controversy surrounding the King James translation. Later translations don’t depend on the KJV but go back to earlier manuscripts in the original languages such as Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

To Top